Summed up

The tagline on this website is there for a reason.  For a very very long time previous, it said something about Falling Down, and while that Something is still true, it’s not entirely relevant as an introduction (and warning) about what goes on with this site.

For those who know me (and who inexplicably choose not to flee as soon as they figure this out) it’s a familiar joke – wondering aloud about whatever my current obsession might be, or how one of my nigh-on-neverending projects is going.  (My obsessions change often, but I am constant in my affections.)

Paul Tevis (whose podcasts I’ve enjoyed for quite awhile, but whose blog I’ve only just discovered) summed the whole problem up very nicely in this post, in which he inadvertently reveals that we share the same brain.

Time is a problem for a dabbler like me. When I want to do something, I want to do it well. I’ve learned enough to know that if I want to do it well, I need to do it regularly. There are only so many hours in the week, which means that if I want to do something, I need to not do something else. The problem is that I want to do everything. This inevitably means I want to do more things than I can do regularly, and thus I end up clinging to things that I do infrequently, taking time away from things I could do well, and spiraling into an overbooked and yet unproductive schedule.

Yeah… tell you what, Paul: whichever one of us figures out how to deal with this first, we’ll let the other one know, deal?

Updates for 2009-04-09

  • Great game of Inspectres: extradimensional death metal, tentacles, frog women, zombies, ectoplasmic daiquiris, and the Cockroach Whisperer. #
  • My “who are your experts” post exploded with good comments: http://is.gd/rCrM *happy* #
  • Adrift: Strange. Kaetlyn knew the ins and outs of nano-crystal difference engines when she was six. She w.. http://tinyurl.com/clzhab #
  • Every business is very quiet today. Eerily quiet. “Day after the zombie outbreak” quiet. “Where’s my machete & do I have enough ammo” quiet. #
  • Next game for Wednesday nights will either be Galactic or PTA, with the ‘loser’ to be the game-after. Much @matt_s_wilson love in Denver. #

Powered by Twitter Tools.

Humorless, page 1

With Hidden Things now revised and sent off into the ether, I have time to start (or resume) other projects. A little bird is whispering in my ear about a couple anthologies that are asking for short stories, but at least for today I’m reacquainting myself with Humorless (a story which, if nothing else, amuses me; sod you all).

Anyway, in honor of it being… (*checks date, then Googles*) ahh… the anniversary of the purchase of the Alaskan territory from Russia, I thought I’d post up the first page of the story.

So… right. Here ’tis; footnotes and all.

Continue reading “Humorless, page 1”

Updates for 2009-04-08

  • RT: @cyface: Watching the mouths of the actors on Castle is amazing. Actual acting – heady stuff. #
  • Adrift: Ship’s systems still work. Impossible, according to everything we know. Then again, ‘everything w.. http://tinyurl.com/ddfr4y #
  • Screw it. Decided to write the scenes in anyway and send the revised-revised revision off. Magical word-finder puzzles FTW. #
  • Also: is anyone else’s “delete this post” button suddenly missing? Cuz I need it. #
  • Adrift: What now? I explain Kaetlyn used one of the systems here; question is: which? The old man suggest.. http://tinyurl.com/c96qlv #
  • Breakfast; took one for the team – filled my bowl with sugary dregs of 3 near-finished boxes. Jittery. Why are you all moving s o s l o w ? #
  • Excellent, excellent post on ktliterary.com today: You Are Not Joss Whedon. http://tinyurl.com/cod5lu #
  • Talking tax stuff with bank people. Whoever says this kind of thing isn’t fun is… absolutely dead-on. #
  • Adrift: I want the note to be for me; for Kaetlyn to know I’d try to find her. It isn’t – jus.. http://tinyurl.com/c6ddsy #

Powered by Twitter Tools.

Who are your experts?

People like to get advice when they’re working on something they’re not too sure about that could easily blow up in their face.  When my lovely wife is trying out a new-to-us, Classic Family Recipe, she calls her mom (which I’m pretty sure her mom loves).

Now, if she times it right (or, to be honest, wrong), she’s going to get a lot more advice than just her mom’s.  I remember one call in which she asked about cooking a proper New York strip steak and ended up with her uncle on the line, giving her a ten minute coaching session on how to cut the thing once it was cooked. One of her sisters will remind her not to leave the gas stove burning all night (a: we have an electric, b: we’re not actually stumbling morons), another sister will suggest she just go out to eat.  It’s charming, and familial, but it’s not necessarily all useful, you know?

But how to do we know what the crap advice is?  Kate’s mom happens to be a good cook – we know this because we’ve eaten her food – but if she were just “ktsmom113@yahoo.com”, posting her suggestions in a forum, how much credence should we give her?

Not… you know… a lot.  Unless the advice itself is good.

“But… Doyce?” I pretend you are asking, “How do we know if the advice is good? If we knew enough about the subject to tell the good from the bad, we wouldn’t need the advice.”

That’s a fair point, pretend-you-in-my-head; well said.   It’s a tricky situation, and it’s not as though you can just look at what the person has done or not done in their life to determine if they’re a qualified expert.  

Kate’s mom has a degree in chemistry, not culinary arts.  I have a friend, De (hi, De!), who gives me wonderful (and harsh, and uncompromising, and brutally honest) writing advice (which I take! I really do!  It just takes me a few days to agree…); but she hasn’t published a book any more than I have (to which I’ll add “yet” to placate both our egos) – where does she get off giving me advice on writing, and what turnip truck did I fall off that I’d listen to her? (The answer is: because she knows writing, and her advice makes my story better. Duh.)  I have another friend who happens to be a very successful author, but I’d never take her advice on finding an agent (for example), because it would probably amount to “while in college, meet someone who will eventually become an agent, stay friends with them while you both learn your respective trades, then have them represent you”, because that’s what she did.

Good karate advice. Crappy fence painting advice.
Good karate teacher. Crappy investment analyst.

It’s confusing, so how do you check?

  • Are they at least involved in the field in some way?
    If it’s writing advice, are they a writer? Or an agent? Or an editor?  Are they, perhaps, married to one of those types of people (you rarely find an expert’s spouse trying to give advice on their spouse’s field of expertise, but that doesn’t mean they can’t – it just means they have some sense).
  • Do they study the subject?
    I don’t self-publish (epublish or make any of my work available via POD services/Amazon).  I have nothing against it, but right now I’m working through Hidden Things with a tradition writer -> agent -> publisher approach, and that’s where my energy is going.  However, while I’m not actually in the trenches of self-publishing at the moment, I am studying the HELL out of it, and I can quote you cost breakdowns and comparisons and marketing tips and distribution methods until you run screaming from the room.  There are people out there who could give you better advice, by virtue of being in those trenches, but my advice would not, probably, be bad.
  • Do they listen to/make use of the experts?
    There’s a web site out there that specializes in telling writers how to find an agent (okay, there are hundreds, but I’m thinking of one in particular). The punchline is that the person running the site is an author who has not, herself, gotten an agent.  WHY would anyone listen to someone like that?  Well, because get gets agents to guest star on her site every couple weeks or so, to give honest, from-the-gut response to the first 250 words of people’s stories.   Funny tip: you don’t actually have to be good at the thing you give perfectly sound advice on.  I mean, that teacher from Fame made Coco the best dancer he could be even though she couldn’t dance anymore. *tears up*

“Double-triple-quadruple check” is what it boils down to, I suppose.   Ninety percent of everything is crap, including advice, so it stands to reason you need to check ten sources to even have a decent chance to getting to the good stuff.  A hundred sources would be much better.

And don’t freak out too much if the advice is coming from a weird source.

Actually, that’s a fun question: what weird source do you get good advice from? (Like Casa Testerman’s cooking tips from a chemist.)

Even better: how do you identify your experts?

Updates for 2009-04-07

  • Really sweet short film, Signs: http://www.dailymotion.pl/video/x87daz_signs_shortfilms – I’d like to go home and kiss my wife now, please. #
  • Just realized I’m teaching a Time Management course tomorrow. Insert the appropriate ironic snark [here] while I run around in a mild panic. #
  • Adrift: Ship’s systems still work. Impossible, according to everything we know. Then again, ‘.. http://tinyurl.com/cmnok4 #
  • Random Average: Wizards of the Coast takes a? novel approach to dealing with PDF piracy http://tinyurl.com/cqlau6 #
  • Holy crow: way way WAY too much good stuff from @thecreativepenn this morning (or… her evening?) to read before morning duties. /bookmark #
  • RT @Three_Star_Dave RT @peoplefor BREAKING! Vermont House overrides Gov. Douglas’s veto of same-sex marriage bill, 100-49! #
  • I am now up to two scenes I’d like to add to former WIP that I’ve already finished. Why couldn’t I have thought of em when I needed words?!? #

Powered by Twitter Tools.

Wizards of the Coast takes a… novel approach to dealing with PDF piracy

Angry Bear is angry.And by “novel”, I mean to say “utterly stupid and short-sighted.”

Earlier this evening RPGNow, Paizo, and DriveThruRPG pulled all of their Wizards of the Coast PDF products (where both new and much much much older products were available) at WotC’s request.  The ability to purchase them ended at noon – the ability to download products that you’ve already bought ended at midnight.

According to Wizards of the Coast, this was done to prevent piracy.  (In a followup statement, they clarified that they believe this… because they are luddite morons.)

“We have [taken these actions] to stop the illegal activities […], and to deter future unauthorized and unlawful file-sharing.”

I love the vast understatement from one gaming site today:

“I predict an increase in piracy of Wizards products.”

REALLY?

Let me take this one step further.  I guarantee – not ‘predict’, but guaran-goddamn-tee that every single PDF of WotC products made available after midnight tonight will be a pirated copy.

Just… think about it for a second; you’ll see exactly what I mean.

See… before today? Sure, some people were sharing PDFs like that on file-sharing sites, and there was pirating going on. Sure, yes.

Was it because the PDFs were made available by WotC and sold online?

No.  You’ve been able to get PDFs of ANY game book — hell, any book at all — even ones that have never had electronic versions available, ever since scanner technology became remotely mainstream (early 90s), because people have time, and geeks have desire for the electronic versions.

Until today, at least most of the people who wanted electronic versions of their game book were getting the PDFs the easy way: google search, got to RPGNow, click, click, download.  No torrent software. No worrying if you picked up a virus with your latest PDF. Easy.

Now, the only way to get the electronic version of a WotC product is to get it from a pirate site.

I can either not get it at all (sucks for me, and WotC gets no money), or I get it from a torrent site (hassle for me, and WotC gets no money).

The pirating people? This has no fucking affect on them what. so. ever.

Well, no; that’s not entirely true.

This move by WotC, ostensibly meant to fight piracy, will actually ensure that more people will come to their site to download ALL the PDFs they want (for games, for novels… whatever — I mean, as long as they’re THERE for the DnD stuff, they might as well look around and see what else is out there, right?…).

It’s not just stupid and short-sighted.  It doesn’t just ensure the piracy of their work by 100% of those that want PDFs of DnD material; it actually hurts all the other companies in the industry as well.