{"id":174,"date":"2008-07-07T08:54:14","date_gmt":"2008-07-07T08:54:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/doycetesterman.com\/wp\/?p=174"},"modified":"2008-07-07T08:54:14","modified_gmt":"2008-07-07T08:54:14","slug":"cooking-and-writing-eating-and-reading","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/doycetesterman.com\/index.php\/2008\/07\/cooking-and-writing-eating-and-reading\/","title":{"rendered":"Cooking and writing, eating and reading."},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"gourmet plus table setting.jpg\" src=\"http:\/\/www.doycetesterman.com\/img\/gourmet plus table setting-thumb-150x112.jpg\" width=\"150\" height=\"112\" class=\"mt-image-left\" style=\"float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;\"\/>Let&#8217;s say you&#8217;re really good at eating food.  You&#8217;re a gourmet consumer.  You <em>know<\/em> what&#8217;s good&#8230; if you&#8217;ve done your homework, you might even know <em>why<\/em> it&#8217;s good.<br \/>\nAnd then, at some point, you try to become a cook.<br \/>\nMaybe you&#8217;re cooking is bad, or maybe it&#8217;s okay &#8212; maybe it&#8217;s even good, and people compliment you on it.<br \/>\nBut no matter what, that first major dish you cook? Even if it&#8217;s good, it&#8217;s not going to be great, not by the standards that you, as a consumer, judge such things.<br \/>\nThat is the point where people often decide to not work on cooking as a serious endeavor anymore, rather than working on getting their cooking to catch up to their taste.  If they need to make themselves some food, they do it, workmanlike, from a prepackaged thing out of the pantry, or they have some soup and a sandwich; they make it well enough to do the job, and that&#8217;s it &#8212; it&#8217;s just meant to fill you up.  If they want <em>great<\/em> food, they feed that desire by consuming someone else&#8217;s cooking.<br \/>\nBut if you&#8217;re really gung-ho about becoming a great cook (or if you sort of like your cooking <i>anyway<\/i>, even if it&#8217;s not the best thing you&#8217;ve ever had), time and practice and the long, slow teaching of years will eventually improve your end product to the point where&#8230; well, you might still be able to nitpick it to yourself, but you can usually step back and stay, objectively, &#8220;This is pretty great.&#8221;<br \/>\nMake sense?  Okay.<br \/>\nRather than make you reread that top bit and play mental word-substitution, I&#8217;ll do it for you:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nLet&#8217;s say you&#8217;re really good at reading.  You <em>know<\/em> what&#8217;s good&#8230; you&#8217;ve done your homework, and even know <em>why<\/em> it&#8217;s good.<br \/>\nAnd then, at some point, you try to become a writer.<br \/>\nMaybe you&#8217;re writing is bad, or maybe it&#8217;s okay &#8212; maybe it&#8217;s even good, and people compliment you on it.<br \/>\nBut no matter what, that first novel you write? Even if it&#8217;s good, it&#8217;s not going to be <em>great<\/em>, not by the standards that you, as a reader, judge such things.<br \/>\nThat is the point where people often decide to not work on writing as a serious endeavor anymore.  If they need to write something (maybe for work), they do it, maybe following an established formula for the genre or topic; they do it well enough, and that&#8217;s it.  If they want <em>great<\/em> stories, they feed that desire by reading someone else&#8217;s work.<br \/>\nBut if you&#8217;re really gung-ho about becoming a great writer (or if you sort of like your writing <i>anyway<\/i>, even if it&#8217;s not the best thing you&#8217;ve ever read), time and practice and the long, slow teaching of years will eventually improve your end product to the point where&#8230; well, you might still be able to nitpick it to yourself, but you can usually step back and stay, objectively, &#8220;This is pretty great.&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>(<a href=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=-hidvElQ0xE\">Ira Glass talks about this whole process in this YouTube video<\/a>, (mostly) unflinchingly using his own old work as an example.  It obviously inspired this ramble.)<br \/>\nI know the people who&#8217;ve done this, both for their cooking and their writing (in one special case, it&#8217;s the same person), and it&#8217;s really something to see.<br \/>\nI am lucky to be someone who likes the food they cook and the stuff they write even when it&#8217;s not that great, and when it&#8217;s only actually even good after some work &#8212; the actual cooking and writing is enjoyable enough, I suppose (it&#8217;s just the cleanup\/revision that I dislike).  Even when it&#8217;s the literary equivalent of bachelor omelets in the microwave, I like it, and like it enough to keep fiddling with it.  I think it must be so much harder for someone who doesn&#8217;t feel that way, and works to get their skill to catch up to their taste while disliking all the products that come from that learning period.  Rather defines the term &#8220;tortured artist&#8221; for me.<br \/>\nOr maybe there aren&#8217;t people like that; maybe we all secretly like the taste of our own horrible culinary experiments, even when we know they&#8217;d make most people sick to their stomach?<br \/>\nNo, I&#8217;m sure that&#8217;s not right &#8212; people throw their &#8216;bad&#8217; stories out all the time (or so I hear).<br \/>\nI don&#8217;t, but that&#8217;s me.<br \/>\nYou?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Let&#8217;s say you&#8217;re really good at eating food. You&#8217;re a gourmet consumer. You know what&#8217;s good&#8230; if you&#8217;ve done your homework, you might even know why it&#8217;s good. And then, at some point, you try to become a cook. Maybe you&#8217;re cooking is bad, or maybe it&#8217;s okay &#8212; maybe it&#8217;s even good, and people &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"http:\/\/doycetesterman.com\/index.php\/2008\/07\/cooking-and-writing-eating-and-reading\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Cooking and writing, eating and reading.&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_import_markdown_pro_load_document_selector":0,"_import_markdown_pro_submit_text_textarea":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-174","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-musing"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/doycetesterman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/174","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/doycetesterman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/doycetesterman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/doycetesterman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/doycetesterman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=174"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/doycetesterman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/174\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/doycetesterman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=174"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/doycetesterman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=174"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/doycetesterman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=174"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}